Buy on Amazon
$143.72
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $102.02 vs $143.72
- Up to 21% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-10600K - $0.92 vs $1.16 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
79.31034482758622%
Price, $
$143.72
70%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-10600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348971 minutes ago
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
89.51612903225806%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10600K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
