Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Core i5-2400S - 214 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $70.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 60% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - $0.37 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
39.784946236559136%
Price, $
$198.9
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
190
88.78504672897196%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
22.689844464775845%
Multi-Core
1352
15.759412518941602%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |