Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 3 3200G - 142 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $80.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 56% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600K - $0.61 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
43.57142857142857%
Price, $
$198.9
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348674 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
132
92.95774647887323%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
48.12442817932296%
Multi-Core
3013
35.120643431635386%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |