Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Core i5-3470 - 214 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $69.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 61% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - $0.36 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
38.70967741935484%
Price, $
$198.9
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
191
89.25233644859813%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348795 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
28.453796889295518%
Multi-Core
1840
21.447721179624665%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |