Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 57% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8320 - 220 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $102.02 vs $160.68
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.68
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348793 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
140
63.63636363636363%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348793 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |