Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1608 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 39% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 230 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
72.17391304347827%
Value, $/FPS
$4.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$788.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
53.44591510725696%
Multi-Core
7539
84.61279461279462%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |