Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570K is 1710 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Celeron G3930 - 164 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - $98.02 vs $120.23
- Up to 16% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-3570K - $0.61 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570K - 51 vs 77 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
83.56164383561644%
Price, $
$120.23
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $120.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349635 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
161
98.17073170731707%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349636 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
88.62973760932945%
Multi-Core
1043
50.36214389183969%
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |