Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670S is 182 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 23% better in Starfield than Celeron G1820 - 54 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Starfield than Celeron G1820 - $1.02 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $46.41 vs $55.26
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670S - 53 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
83%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354117 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
44
81.48148148148148%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
97.14285714285714%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
42.658557775847086%
Multi-Core
825
25.35341118623233%
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |