Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4670S outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4670S is 599 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8150 - 156 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than FX-8150 - $55.26 vs $64.03
- Up to 19% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8150 - $0.35 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280529 minutes ago
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280528 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |