Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690 is 978 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 128 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $52.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 50% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.41 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 51 vs 84 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349869 minutes ago
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349867 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
51.04953820319059%
Multi-Core
1043
31.57735392067817%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |