Buy on Amazon
$53.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 587 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 6% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-8320 - 199 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than FX-8320 - $53.5 vs $102.02
- Up to 50% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than FX-8320 - $0.27 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 88 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-4690K Processor 3.9 4 BX80646I54690K
Buy for $53.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350203 minutes ago
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
