Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 28% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8300 - 179 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $47.98 vs $140.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-8400 - $0.34 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
43.58974358974359%
Price, $
$140
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349940 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
140
78.2122905027933%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349939 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |