Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 2364 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 36% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-8150 - 90 vs 66 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $64.03 vs $139.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-8400T - $0.97 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 8 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
62.98701298701298%
Price, $
$139
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361042 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
66
73.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |