Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G4900 - 141 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $50.0 vs $160.91
- Up to 65% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-9400 - $0.4 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
35.08771929824562%
Price, $
$160.91
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
88.65248226950354%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
44.50867052023121%
Multi-Core
1051
21.91866527632951%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |