Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 280 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G4900 - 113 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $50.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-9400F - $0.5 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
50.505050505050505%
Price, $
$112
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361142 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
89.38053097345133%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
44.70246734397678%
Multi-Core
1051
21.741828713280928%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |