Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2921 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-2600 - 266 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $54.95 vs $112.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - $0.23 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
54.761904761904766%
Price, $
$112
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361164 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
240
90.22556390977444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $54.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
612
44.412191582002905%
Multi-Core
2054
42.4906909391808%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |