Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1681 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Pentium G3258 - 266 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $51.36 vs $112.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - $0.21 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
240
90.22556390977444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
44.48476052249637%
Multi-Core
1074
22.217625155151012%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |