Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Celeron G1820 - 177 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $46.41 vs $225.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-10700F - $0.28 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
21.875000000000004%
Price, $
$225.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361886 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
163
92.09039548022598%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361885 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
30.4590570719603%
Multi-Core
825
11.409210344350711%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |