Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 2600X - 275 vs 261 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $99.97 vs $205.5
- Up to 49% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-10700KF - $0.38 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
50.66666666666667%
Price, $
$205.5
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361225 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
261
94.9090909090909%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361225 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
72.76470588235294%
Multi-Core
5263
65.11196337993319%
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |