Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 2256 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3900 - 153 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $39.95 vs $253.44
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-12700K - $0.34 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
20.481927710843376%
Price, $
$253.44
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $253.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362302 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
76.47058823529412%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
22.95535361517187%
Multi-Core
992
7.244048488389075%
Intel Core i7-12700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |