Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 220 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $369.99 vs $788.88
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348325 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
82.27272727272728%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$788.88
46%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
40.56113612746796%
Multi-Core
7539
42.82062933090992%
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |