Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2290 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 220 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $94.05 vs $369.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700KF - $0.52 vs $1.68 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
30.952380952380953%
Price, $
$369.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
182
82.72727272727273%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
40.872878420505714%
Multi-Core
5480
31.125752584346245%
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |