Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $75.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 24% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-10400F - $0.6 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i7-3770S - 143 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
124
86.7132867132867%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349269 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
75.94936708860759%
Price, $
$112.53
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
46.522948539638385%
Multi-Core
2234
38.845418188141196%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |