Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 441 days older than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 112 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $100.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 69% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - $0.9 vs $2.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.86/FPS
31.46853146853147%
Price, $
$319.88
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348850 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
111
99.10714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |