Buy on Amazon
$319.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1296 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3820 - 133 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $99.9 vs $319.88
- Up to 70% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3820 - $0.75 vs $2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
129
96.99248120300751%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
30.241935483870968%
Price, $
$319.88
31%
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348736 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348737 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
52.15553677092139%
Multi-Core
2299
64.46999439147504%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
