Buy on Amazon
$319.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $621
Availability
MSRP in USD: $621
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1589 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - 119 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $94.05 vs $319.88
- Up to 72% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3820 - $0.79 vs $2.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
112
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$2.86/FPS
27.622377622377627%
Price, $
$319.88
29%
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348839 minutes ago
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Hexa-core (6 Core) 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
52.28813559322034%
Multi-Core
2299
41.95255474452555%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
