Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-5930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1074 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $549.95 vs $788.88
- Up to 30% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.79 vs $3.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i7-5930K - 198 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 32 vs 12 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
197
99.4949494949495%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$549.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.98/FPS
70.10050251256281%
Price, $
$788.88
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1156
98.71904355251921%
Multi-Core
5480
72.68868550205598%
Intel Core i7-5930K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |