Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1043 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 25% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8300 - 114 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $47.98 vs $99.9
- Up to 40% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-6700T - $0.53 vs $0.88 per FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
60.22727272727273%
Price, $
$99.9
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360499 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
91
79.82456140350878%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360498 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |