Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 1316 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than FX-8320 - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $102.02 vs $651.07
- Up to 83% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6950X - $0.54 vs $3.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.27/FPS
16.51376146788991%
Price, $
$651.07
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
95.47738693467338%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |