Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 741 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 27% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 3200G - 52 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $80.0 vs $375.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-7820X - $1.95 vs $7.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.21/FPS
27.045769764216367%
Price, $
$375
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
41
78.84615384615384%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
74.5570517363572%
Multi-Core
3013
38.38705567588227%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |