Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3589 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $48.0 vs $80.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.41 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-860 - 126 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
116
92.06349206349206%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361525 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
65.07936507936508%
Price, $
$80
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361526 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |