Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2674 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 51% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $48.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 40% better value when playing League of Legends than Celeron G3930 - $0.86 vs $1.44 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 21% better in League of Legends than Core i7-860 - 68 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
56
82.35294117647058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361661 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
59.72222222222222%
Price, $
$98.02
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361660 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |