Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 560 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 60 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $94.05 vs $869.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-8700 - $1.71 vs $14.5 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.5/FPS
11.793103448275861%
Price, $
$869.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $869.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349703 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
55
91.66666666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349703 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
77.99074686054198%
Multi-Core
5480
92.80270956816258%
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |