Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Celeron G3930 - 176 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $98.02 vs $192.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-8700K - $0.6 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
55.04587155963302%
Price, $
$192
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $192 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349450 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
93.18181818181817%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.43236409608091%
Multi-Core
1043
16.188111128356354%
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |