Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-8150 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-8150 is 1059 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 4% better in League of Legends than Core i7-920 - 55 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $64.03 vs $90.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-920 - $1.16 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
53
96.36363636363636%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
68.23529411764706%
Price, $
$90
71%
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359765 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359765 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
95.18348623853211%
Multi-Core
1434
82.69896193771626%
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |