Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3424 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-920 - 240 vs 233 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $50.0 vs $90.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-920 - $0.21 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
233
97.08333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
53.84615384615385%
Price, $
$90
55%
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360491 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360490 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |