Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 516 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 33% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 60 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $280.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 73% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $4.67 vs $17.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 32 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$280
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
45
75%
Value, $/FPS
$17.53/FPS
26.640045636052477%
Price, $
$788.88
35%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
70.28811524609844%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |