Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 40% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6350 - 198 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $100.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900K - $0.71 vs $2.47 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.47/FPS
28.744939271255056%
Price, $
$490
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349463 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
141
71.21212121212122%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |