Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930 - 195 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $98.02 vs $283.35
- Up to 61% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.57 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
39.3103448275862%
Price, $
$283.35
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348676 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
87.6923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
34.48667044809983%
Multi-Core
1043
11.393926152501638%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |