Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4300 - 199 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $48.02 vs $265.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900K - $0.32 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
24.06015037593985%
Price, $
$265
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361994 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
75.87939698492463%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361994 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |