Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 199 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $50.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900K - $0.32 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
24.06015037593985%
Price, $
$265
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361879 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
77.88944723618091%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361879 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
25.98059890341628%
Multi-Core
1051
9.599926927292657%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |