Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 51% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6350 - 676 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $100.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900KF - $0.22 vs $0.36 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
676
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
61.111111111111114%
Price, $
$240
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361188 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
448
66.27218934911244%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |