Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 44% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 239 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $240.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 79% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.0 vs $4.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348502 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
69.4560669456067%
Value, $/FPS
$4.75/FPS
21.052631578947366%
Price, $
$788.88
30%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
50.5394907207596%
Multi-Core
7539
74.45925925925926%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |