Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1963 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 146 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $94.05 vs $350.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-12900KF - $0.71 vs $2.4 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
29.583333333333332%
Price, $
$350.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $350.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348850 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
133
91.0958904109589%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
46.42014162077104%
Multi-Core
5480
36.82548215845709%
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |