Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1981 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 14% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 151 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
88.0794701986755%
Value, $/FPS
$5.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$788.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
37.7133655394525%
Multi-Core
7539
34.53029817249118%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |