Buy on Amazon
$1,099
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7980XE outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7980XE is 22 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7980XE
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-7980XE - $788.88 vs $1099.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7980XE - $6.21 vs $8.26 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-7980XE
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.26/FPS
75.181598062954%
Price, $
$1099
71%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80673I97980X Core i9-7980XE Processors
Buy for $1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358267 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
127
95.48872180451127%
Value, $/FPS
$6.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$788.88
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-7980XE
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
78.32775919732441%
Multi-Core
7539
64.90185950413223%
Intel Core i9-7980XE | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 16 |
36 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
