Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900X is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 16% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 167 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $550.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 40% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $3.29 vs $5.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900X - 32 vs 20 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$550
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $550 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351227 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
144
86.22754491017965%
Value, $/FPS
$5.48/FPS
60.036496350364956%
Price, $
$788.88
69%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
78.69623655913979%
Multi-Core
7539
79.22446406052963%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |