Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1513 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 17% better in Starfield than Core i7-3770S - 55 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 20% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $75.0 vs $94.05
- Up to 6% better value when playing Starfield than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $1.6 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
93%
Price, $
$94.05
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280348 minutes ago
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |