Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3537 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $100.0 vs $369.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - $0.9 vs $2.71 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 23% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 136 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
111
81.61764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348971 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.71/FPS
33.210332103321036%
Price, $
$369
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348972 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |