Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2080 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $100.0 vs $359.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-9900KF - $0.76 vs $1.82 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 49% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 197 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
132
67.00507614213198%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348968 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
41.75824175824176%
Price, $
$359
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |